Objectives This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a combined steroid and diuretic (isosorbide) treatment with that of steroid-only treatment in patients with acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss (ALHL).
Methods A total of 34 patients with ALHL were recruited between January 2018 and December 2019 and randomized into two groups: a steroid-with-diuretic (isosorbide) group and a steroid-only group. The steroid-with-diuretic group received oral methylprednisolone for 10 days and isosorbide for 14 days, while the steroid-only group received methylprednisolone for 10 days. Hearing outcomes were measured using pure-tone audiometry at 8 weeks posttreatment. The outcomes were the absolute hearing gain at low frequencies (125, 250, and 500 Hz) and the recovery rate, which was classified into complete, partial, unchanged, progressive, and fluctuating.
Results Of 34 patients, 30 (15 in each group) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the groups. The steroid-with-diuretic group showed higher absolute hearing gains at all three low frequencies than the steroid-only group, but the differences were not statistically significant complete recovery was observed in 13 patients in each group, with partial recovery in two patients in the steroid-with-diuretic group and unchanged outcomes in two patients in the steroid-only group. No patient exhibited disease progression.
Conclusions Although combined steroid and diuretic therapy yielded better hearing outcomes than steroid-only therapy, the differences were not statistically significant. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are necessary to confirm these findings.
Objectives Idiopathic unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) with simultaneous benign paroxysmal vertigo (BPPV) is known to be associated with poor hearing recovery. We aimed to investigate clinical findings in patients with SSNHL with BPPV and analyze prognostic factors including presence of BPPV related to hearing outcome.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical data of 14 patients with concurrent SSNHL and BPPV (combined group). We selected 52 patients without BPPV as a control group who have matched initial threshold of pure tone audiometry and age of each patient in the combined group. We evaluated clinical characteristics of all participants and compared hearing outcomes between the 2 groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors related to hearing recovery.
Results Initial mean pure tone audiometry (PTA) threshold of combined group was 90.36±26.2 dB. Posterior canal was most commonly involved (n=7, 50%), and 8 (57%) patients showed abnormal video head impulse test results. There was no significant difference between hearing recovery rates of combined and control group (p=0.237) and mean pure tone audiometry threshold changes were not significantly different between the 2 groups (p=0.942). Old age (≥60 years), high initial PTA threshold (>90 dB), and obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) were poor prognostic predictors.
Conclusions There was no difference between hearing outcomes of combined group and profound SSNHL only group. BPPV was not a significant prognostic factor of SSNHL patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Which Is More Important for the Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Vertigo, Canal Paresis or Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo? Yong-Hwi An, Hyun Joon Shim Research in Vestibular Science.2021; 20(3): 101. CrossRef