Objectives Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) have been reported to be useful in evaluating not only vestibular function but also the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) patients. Even though low frequency, high frequency, and all frequency-involved ISSNHL groups tend to show varied clinical characteristics, there is a lack of data using VEMP results to analyze these subgroups. We investigated if the VEMP test is a valuable tool to predict recovery from hearing loss in association with different frequencies.
Methods A total of 26 ISSNHL patients were divided into three different groups impaired with low tone (ascending type), high tone (descending type), and all tones (flat type) based on the initial audiograms. Each group included five, 10, and 11 patents, respectively, and their VEMP results were compared between the three subgroups.
Results Abnormal VEMP results were found in five of the total 26 ISSNHL patients (19.2%). Two (40.0%), one (10.0%), and two (18.1%) patients of low tone, high tone, and all tone hearing loss groups, respectively, showed abnormal VEMP results. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups.
Conclusions Even though VEMP is known as a valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of ISSNHL patients, it does not seem to reflect frequency-sensitive aspects of ISSNHL.
Objectives This study was performed to evaluate the difference of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) stimulated by bone-conduction (BC) and air-conduction (AC) in patients with nonspecific dizziness.
Methods Twenty-eight dizzy patients (56 ears) and 15 subjects (30 ears) as normal control was enrolled. Responses of BC- and AC-cVEMP were recorded sequentially in both groups. cVEMP parameters including latencies, inter-latencies intervals, amplitudes, and interaural amplitude asymmetry were analyzed and compared.
Results Among the patients with nonspecific dizziness, AC-cVEMP responses were clearly detected in all 56 ears while BC-cVEMP responses were detected in 32 ears (57.1%). Amplitudes of BC-cVEMP were significantly smaller than those of AC-cVEMP in all patients with BC-cVEMP response. There was no difference in latencies, inter-latencies intervals, and interaural amplitude asymmetry ratios between BC- and AC-cVEMP. There was no significant difference in BCand AC-cVEMP between the dizzy and control groups.
Conclusions BC-cVEMP is not clinically useful in comparison to AC-cVEMP for the evaluation of nonspecific dizziness. An effective stimulation tool for BC is necessary to provoke more reliable responses of BC-cVEMP.
Objective: Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) is thought to be assessing the function of the saccule and inferior vestibular nerve. Therefore, cVEMP indirectly reflects the function of the posterior semicircular canal. Recently, the video head impulse test (vHIT) is considered as useful clinical tool to detect each semicircular canal dysfunction. Goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of cVEMP with posterior canal plane of vHIT (p-vHIT).
Methods Retrospectively, we compared the results of cVEMP with p-vHIT in 43 patients who visited with dizziness. We analyzed the inter-test agreement of cVEMP with p-vHIT.
Results Positive asymmetry of cVEMP was present in 37.2% (16/43), and no responses of both ears were identified in 16.3% (7/43). In p-vHIT analysis, unilateral positive was 27.9% (12/43), bilateral positive was 11.6% (5/43) and negative in both sides was 60.5% (26/43). The inter-test agreement between cVEMP and p-vHIT was 75.8% (25/33) as we considered even in lesion side. And, Fleiss’s kappa value showed a fair to good agreement (kappa value=0.559). In bilateral no response group (7 patients) in cVEMP, variable additional information could be obtained using p-vHIT.
Conclusion cVEMP and p-vHIT showed relatively lower inter-test agreement than expected. But, p-vHIT could be easily performed, and give additional information for differential diagnosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical Characteristics of the Patients with Dizziness after Car Accidents Young Min Hah, Chul Won Yang, Sang Hoon Kim, Seung Geun Yeo, Moon Suh Park, Jae Yong Byun Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Nec.2017; 60(8): 390. CrossRef
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) may be one
of the important clinical tools for evaluation of vestibular function. Cervical
VEMP evaluates saccule and reflects the functional status of inferior vestibular
nerve combining with vertical head impulse test. Ocular VEMP assesses utricle
function and provides superior vestibular nerve function in addition to horizontal
head impulse test and caloric test. Currently, the clinical implications of VEMP
have been expanded to estimate disease severity and location, differentiate diverse
vestibular disorders, and predict the prognosis. In present review, we discuss the
findings of VEMP according to the lesion location from peripheral vestibular
dysfunction to central vestibulopathy and disease characteristics from monophasic
transient disorders to chronic progressive disorders.
Background and Objectives: Orthostatic dizziness (OD) is defined as when
dizziness is provoked by standing up from a supine or sitting position. It is usually
considered as being associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH). On the other
hand, it is recently suggested that otolith organ dysfunction and impaired
vestibulosympathetic reflex may account for development of OH and OD.
Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) and subjective visual vertical and
horizontal tests (SVV/SVH) are tools for detecting otolith organ dysfunction. We
assessed cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and SVV/SVH test results in the patients with
OD to evaluate the relationship between OD and otolith organ function. Materials
and Methods: Three hundred-eighty-seven patients who visited dizziness clinic
were enrolled in this study. Seventy-three patients presented with OD (i.e., group
O), while 314 patients did not present OD (i.e., group N). Vestibular function
tests including cVEMP and SVV/SVH were performed. Results: cVEMP showed
abnormal response in 47.9% of group O and 60.2% of group N. Abnormal SVV
was found in 35.6% of group O and 31.5% of group N. Abnormal SVH was
highly found in both group O and group N (30.1%, 27.1%). Conclusion: The
values of SVV/SVH and cVEMP abnormality from both groups were not
significantly different between the groups O and N. This finding suggests that
otolithic function may not be related with OD.
Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) has developed as a broadly
applied vestibular function test in clinics from its introduction in 1992. In the
past, there was only one well known VEMP protocol, which is cervical VEMP,
however recently ocular VEMP is also popular. Therefore, clarifying the VEMP
recording protocol (cervical VEMP or ocular VEMP) before discussing the VEMP result has become essential. There is considerable difference regarding this VEMP
test from other vestibular function tests. VEMP is thought to be assessing the
functions of the otolith organs (utricle and saccule) which are evoked by acoustic
stimulus. Cervical VEMP is valuable since this is the only available test method
which could speculate the function of the saccule and inferior vestibular nerve.
Still, there’s less clearly understood part regarding the central pathway of VEMP.
However, many clinicians and researchers participating in vestibular research
speculate that this functional test will have a more dominant role in the near
future. Here we describe the basic principles and methodological considerations
regarding VEMP recording.
Background and Objectives: Subjective visual vertical (SVV) reflects utricle and
superior vestibular neural functions, and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic
potentials (cVEMP) reflect saccule and inferior vestibular neural functions. But,
origin and characteristics of ocular VEMP (oVEMP) remain controversial, especially
in case of evoked by air conducted sound (ACS). Thus, the aim of this study
was to identify the origin and characteristics of oVEMP by comparing with
various otolith function tests. Materials and Methods: Forty vestibular neuritis
patients were enrolled from September 2012 to January 2013 in this study. We
examined cVEMP, oVEMP using 500 Hz air-counducted sounds. And, we
measured static and dynamic SVV. Results: Abnormal cVEMP responses were
observed in 6 (15%) patients, and abnormal oVEMP responses were observed
in 28 (70%) patients. Abnormal static and dynamic SVV were observed in 18
(45%), 35 (87.5%) patients, respectively. There was strong correlation between
oVEMP and dynamic SVV (p=0.009). Conclusion: ACS oVEMP responses
showed different tendency from cVEMP responses in vestibular neuritis patients,
but similar tendency with results of dynamic SVV. The results suggest that origin
of oVEMP is different from that of cVEMP and maybe utricle and superior
vestibular neuron.
Background and Objectives: Vestibular neuritis predominantly affects the superior branch of the vestibular nerve, resulting in vertigo. Acute viral labyrinthitis occurs when an infection affects both vestibulo-cochlear nerve and labyrinth, resulting in hearing changes as well as vertigo. The purpose of study is to identify there is a difference of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) in patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Materials and Methods: cVEMP and oVEMP tests using 500-Hz tone-burst stimuli were performed on patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Pure tone audiometry, caloric test and subjective visual vertical (SVV) were performed in all patients. We compared the VEMP results, SVV, caloric test in patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Results: Abnormal cVEMP responses were detected in 2 (20%) patients with vestibular neuritis and 5 (100%) patients with labyrinthitis. Abnormal oVEMP responses were detected in 9 patients (90%) with vestibular neuritis and 5 (100%) patients with labyrinthitis. oVEMP abnormalities is correlated with caloric test and subjective visual vertical in patients with vestibular neuritis and labyrinthits. Conclusion: Our results shows that the response of cVEMP and oVEMP between patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis is different. We can infer that oVEMP response to air-conducted sound is different vestibular origin compared to cVEMP and may originate from utricle.
Background and Objectives: Since the liberated otoconia from the degenerated utricle has been postulated as the cause of the benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), the relationship of the utricular function and the generation of BPPV have been studied. In addition, abnormal bone metabolism and vascular risk factors resulting insufficient circulation to utricle has been reported to be related to the utricular degeneration in BPPV. We investigated the relationship between the vascular risk factors, bone mineral density (BMD) and recurrence for the BPPV and otholith function tests of BPPV. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients 84 with BPPV were recruited in a dizziness clinic. Caloric test, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) were tested in all the patients in acute phase of BPPV. At the same time, vascular risk factors and BMD were performed. Vascular risk factors were history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia and ischemic heart disease. All the data were analyzed for the relationship between abnormal results of vestibular function tests and the risk factors. Results: Patients 58 (69%) showed abnormal cervical VEMPs that were related to decreased bone density, having more than one vascular risk factor, and older age (>55 years). Abnormal oVEMPs were showed in 53 patients (63%) that were related to older age and vascular risk factors, but not statistically related to bone mineral density. Caloric tests failed to show any statistically significant results. Conclusion: We found abnormal results of cVEMPs and oVEMPs is related to the BMD, vascular risk factors and age. VEMPs could be used for the demonstration of presumptive otolith degeneration in BPPV.
Objectives: To investigate the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) results in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) patients and to verify its clinical applications in BPPV.
Subjects and Methods: Forty-one patients with diagnosis of BPPV and 92 healthy volunteers who underwent VEMP testing. Patients were treated by canalith repositioning maneuvers according to the affected canal, and testing of VEMP was performed at diagnosis and after treatment.
Results: VEMP results of BPPV patients showed prolonged p13 and n23 latencies compared with those of the control group, and we could not find any significant difference in VEMP latencies between patients with posterior and horizontal canal type of BPPV. The number of times that the maneuver was repeated did not correlate with the degree of latency prolongation, but in the “no response” group, the number of times was considerably greater than those in the “response” group.
Conclusions: We found that VEMP latencies are increased in BPPV patients, which may signify neuronal degenerative changes in the macula of the saccule. When an extensive neuronal damage was suspected by VEMP results such as “no response” in VEMP, the disease progress showed a chronic and resistive course. Therefore, we propose that VEMP could be a useful method to determine a clinical prognosis of patients with BPPV.
Background and Objectives: The aims of this study were to measure otolith function using subjective visual vertical (SVV) test and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test in patients with unilateral Meniere’s disease, and to see the relationship of the otolithic impairment with caloric and audiologic results.
Materials and Methods: Twenty two patients with unilateral Meniere’s disease who received treatment and also had been tested for pure tone, caloric, SVV and VEMP tests were enrolled. All the tests were done simultaneously.
Results: Five of 22 (23%) patients showed abnormal tilt to the lesion side in SVV test, and 13 of 22 (59%) patients showed abnormal VEMP results on the affected side. There was no correlation between SVV tilts and unilateral weakness (UW) in caloric tests or pure-tone average. There was also no difference of UW in patients with or without VEMP abnormalities. Two patients showed abnormal finding in both SVV & VEMP tests. One patient showed UW (47%) and SVV tilt (3.08°) to the lesion side, and the other showed normal UW and SVV tilt (3.22°) to the lesion side.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the otolith system was implicated in 16 out of 22 (73%) patients with Meniere’s disease. However, there was no correlation between the abnormal results of the three tests and these findings suggest that impairment of the otolithic function is depending on the extent and/or the localization of Meniere’s disease, suggesting vestibular rehabilitation for the specific lesion might be helpful.
Background and Objectives: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) test provides a useful method for assessment of saccule function and the functional integrity of the inferior vestibular nerve, and subjective visual vertical (SVV) abnormalities are presumably related to a lesion of the utricle. The aim(s) of this study were to measure otolith function using SVV and VEMP tests, and to define the influence of the otolithic organs in patients suffering from vestibular neuritis.
Materials and Method: From September 2005 to January 2006, twelve patients who received treatment in hospital and also had been tested for caloric test, subjective visual vertical (SVV) and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) tests with unilateral vestibular neuritis were enrolled. All the tests were done within 8 days after the onset of their symptoms, simultaneously. The SVV was measured in 34 normal subjects as well as in patients.
Results Eight of 12 patients showed abnormal tilt to the lesion side in SVV test, and five of 8 patients showed no VEMP on the affected side. There was no correlation between SVV tilts and unilateral weakness (UW) in caloric tests. Two patients with abnormal UW (54, 82%) showed normal finding in SVV & VEMP tests. One patient with abnormal UW (83%) and SVV tilts (18.04˚) to the lesion side was normal in VEMP test. Two patients with abnormal UW (28, 37%) and no response in VEMP test were normal in SVV test.
Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the incidence of abnormal results were 62.5, 66.7% in VEMP and SVV tests in acute stage of vestibular neuritis, respectively. There was no correlation between the abnormal results of the tests and these findings suggest that impairment of the otolithic function is depending on the extent and/or the localization of vestibular neuritis.
Key Words : Vestibular neuritis, Otolith, Vestibular function tests, Subjective visual vertical, Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials